Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

profiles: drop Sample.label #583

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

florianl
Copy link
Contributor

@florianl florianl commented Sep 10, 2024

Drop Sample.label in favor of Sample.attributes. While label and attributes fulfill the same purpose, it is not defined which one to choose for which information. Therefore, drop label in favor of attributes.

FYI: @open-telemetry/profiling-maintainers
spec:profiles

Drop `Sample.label` in favor of `Sample.attributes`. While `label` and `attributes` fulfill the same purpose, it is not defined which one choose for which information. Therefore, drop `label` in favor of `attributes`.

FYI: @open-telemetry/profiling-maintainers
spec:profiles
@florianl florianl requested review from a team September 10, 2024 12:33
Copy link
Member

@felixge felixge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks 🙇

@tigrannajaryan tigrannajaryan merged commit 9408ae8 into open-telemetry:main Sep 16, 2024
15 checks passed
dmathieu pushed a commit to dmathieu/opentelemetry-proto that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
Drop `Sample.label` in favor of `Sample.attributes`. While `label` and `attributes` fulfill the same purpose, it is not defined which one choose for which information. Therefore, drop `label` in favor of `attributes`.

FYI: @open-telemetry/profiling-maintainers
spec:profiles

Co-authored-by: Tigran Najaryan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants