Add definitions required for triple terms #30
Conversation
|
This PR seems to be running somewhat in advance of WG decisions? |
It is a Draft, so could just be anticipating that this will be adopted, but I agree that it may still be premature, as semantics could go in a different direction. |
|
Yes, this is a draft. I've only added one class. Properties are waiting to see how the discussion goes. |
|
It sounds good to update this PR to track where we're at. How about re-titling it to "Add definitions required for triple terms"? I think defining In Turtle, I'm thinking: rdf:reifies a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource ;
rdfs:range rdf:Proposition ;
rdfs:label "reifies"@en ;
rdfs:comment "The abstract proposition of a more concrete circumstance."@en .
rdf:Proposition a rdfs:Class ;
rdfs:label "proposition"@en ;
rdfs:comment "An atomic, logical, abstract proposition."@en .(See also w3c/rdf-concepts#115 and w3c/rdf-semantics#49 for additional properties relating a proposition to its constituents (in "classicized" and and symmetric RDF respectively). They may end up being defined elsewhere, so I don't think we can add those in this PR. Note that these referenced issues also need updates to reflect this recent convergence.) |
domel
changed the title
|
Thank you for the feedback and suggestions. I have updated the PR as proposed and re-titled it to "Add definitions required for triple terms". |
domel
requested review from
gkellogg and
niklasl
and removed request for
gkellogg
|
See PR #31 |
| <tr> | ||
| <td><a href="#ch_reificationproperty">rdf:ReificationProperty</a></td> | ||
| <td>The class of properties used for reification in RDF.</td> | ||
| </tr> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is no longer defined. Instead, rows for rdf:reifies and rdf:Proposition should be added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, that's why I deleted this part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I still see rdf:ReificationProperty in two places of the document. Or am I missing something?
|
|
||
| <section id="ch_proposition"> | ||
| <h3>rdf:Proposition</h3> | ||
| <p><code>rdf:Proposition</code> is the class of reified triples. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update this to the definition in the RDF representation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is a PR for RDF Representation, I will handle this in a couple of days.
Preview | Diff