Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Initial stab at living CR/REC #151

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Initial stab at living CR/REC #151

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

plehegar
Copy link
Member

@plehegar plehegar commented Oct 1, 2021 •
edited
Loading

(this is work in progress)

@plehegar plehegar added the enhancement The specification works as-is but could be improved. label Oct 1, 2021
@wseltzer
Copy link
Member

wseltzer commented Oct 1, 2021

Note this related thread re charter language: w3c/charter-drafts#275

@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

pchampin commented Oct 1, 2021

@plehegar meta-remark: under the 'Reviewers' section (at the top of the left pane), you have a link to "Convert to draft" this PR. It will be explicitly marked as a draft, and I guess that the merge button will not be available.

@plehegar plehegar marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2022 13:07
@plehegar plehegar mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2022
Closed
@plehegar
Copy link
Member Author

I think I addressed the initial feedback (thank you @nigelmegitt ). I feel more comfortable asking for feedback from a wider audience now (team and process CG, then Chairs)

chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chaals
chaals reviewed Jan 25, 2022
View reviewed changes
process/living-cr-rec.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@plehegar plehegar self-assigned this Mar 25, 2022
plehegar
plehegar commented Sep 2, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member Author

@plehegar plehegar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additional improvements

@plehegar plehegar marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2022 11:57
@jeffjaffe
Copy link

It would be useful to characterize when one "uses" living CR and when one uses REC. For example, if a spec is destined to be used by a regulatory body, or used by vendors to pour silicon to put it into a chip - you really need a REC. If you are working on spec-text that rapidly evolves on an annual basis, it may be preferable to use living CR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nigelmegitt nigelmegitt nigelmegitt left review comments

@chaals chaals chaals left review comments

@wseltzer wseltzer wseltzer approved these changes

Assignees

@plehegar plehegar

Labels
enhancement The specification works as-is but could be improved.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@plehegar @wseltzer @pchampin @jeffjaffe @chaals @nigelmegitt