Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(server): add SSR test for renderHook #799

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 18, 2022

Conversation

jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor

@jsjoeio jsjoeio commented Feb 27, 2022

What:

This PR adds a new test based on the work done in #607 to fix #605. Partially related to #796

Why:

I noticed a test wasn't added when that bug was fixed. I decided to add a test so we could prevent regressions.

How:

A new test was added which runs in a Node environment in Jest.

Checklist:

  • Documentation updated
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged
  • Added myself to contributors table

Joe added 2 commits February 27, 2022 05:02
This adds a new test to verify that renderHook can be called in an
SSR-like environment based on the changes implemented in testing-library#607.
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 27, 2022

Deploy Preview for react-hooks-testing-library failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9d35e1c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/react-hooks-testing-library/deploys/62a39be0c64b2b000889682f

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #799 (9d35e1c) into main (efd262c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #799   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        15           
  Lines          246       245    -1     
  Branches        34        34           
=========================================
- Hits           246       245    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/server/pure.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update efd262c...9d35e1c. Read the comment docs.

Comment on lines +1 to +3
/**
* @jest-environment node
*/
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice if we could have sone server only tests run in the node environment without jsdom to make sure we don't break it in the future, but I'm not sure how we would do that for just some tests?

✍🏼 This technique is handy for running specific tests in a Node environment.

See docs.

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ function createServerRenderer<TProps, TResult>(
) {
let renderProps: TProps | undefined
let container: HTMLDivElement | undefined
let serverOutput: string = ''
let serverOutput = ''
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Since we give serverOutput a default value of '', TS can infer string type. The type annotation here is not needed.

@jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsjoeio commented Feb 27, 2022

   Warning: It looks like you called ReactTestUtils.act(...) in a non-browser environment. If you're using TestRenderer for your tests, you should call ReactTestRenderer.act(...) instead of ReactTestUtils.act(...).

I looked at src/__tests__/autoDetectRenderer.test.ts because it has a reactTestRenderer but it looks custom 🤔 Any tips on how to fix this?

@jsjoeio jsjoeio marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2022 05:22
@jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsjoeio commented Mar 4, 2022

Hey @mpeyper - looks like the test is failing. Would love to get your insights to fix this 🙏

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member

mpeyper commented Mar 5, 2022

The test looks fine, I’ll see if I can get to the bottom of it.

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ function createServerRenderer<TProps, TResult>(
) {
let renderProps: TProps | undefined
let container: HTMLDivElement | undefined
let serverOutput: string = ''
let serverOutput = ''
const testHarness = createTestHarness(rendererProps, wrapper, false)

return {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

github won't let me comment on the actual line, but the error in the test is being caused by the act call on line 22. For some reason, when you use [email protected] this tried to use the document which throws an error when testing in the node environment, which doesn't occur in newer versions.

You can replicate this by running:

npm run install:react-16.9.0
npm test -- --no-watch src/__tests__/ssr.test.ts

In the context of server rendering, the act call is not really necessary here. Dropping it out still passes all of our tests and allows your new test to pass with the older version:

    render(props?: TProps) {
      renderProps = props
      try {
        serverOutput = ReactDOMServer.renderToString(testHarness(props))
      } catch (e: unknown) {
        rendererProps.setError(e as Error)
      }
    },

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, I don't think I would have figured that out on my own 😅 I'll test this out and make the necessary changes. Thanks a bunch!

jsjoeio added 2 commits June 10, 2022 19:29
@mpeyper explained how this `act` call in server rendering is not really
necessary so we can remove it.
@jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsjoeio commented Jun 10, 2022

Well, that worked! Of course now Netlify is failing lol

12:34:31 PM: error Error in "/opt/build/repo/node_modules/gatsby-plugin-mdx/gatsby-node.js": globalThis is not defined

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member

mpeyper commented Jun 10, 2022

Yeah, the Netlify build had been failing for a while and I’m not sure how to fix it. I’ve mostly been ignoring it with maintenance on this library wrapping up soon anyway.

This all looks fine to me and will try to get it merged next time I’m at my computer.

@jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsjoeio commented Jun 16, 2022

@mpeyper any updates on this by chance? 👀

@mpeyper mpeyper merged commit e2461ca into testing-library:main Jun 18, 2022
@mpeyper
Copy link
Member

mpeyper commented Jun 18, 2022

Sorry for the delay, and thanks again for the effort.

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 8.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@jsjoeio jsjoeio deleted the jsjoeio-add-test branch June 18, 2022 15:07
@jsjoeio jsjoeio restored the jsjoeio-add-test branch June 18, 2022 15:07
@jsjoeio
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsjoeio commented Jun 18, 2022

woohoo! thanls for letting me bug you and for the tips!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Usage in close-to-real SSR environment?
2 participants