Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KTOR-7828 Revert removed content-length check #4505

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

e5l
Copy link
Member

@e5l e5l commented Nov 25, 2024

KTOR-7828 CIO: Response body truncated because read amount of bytes isn't compared against Content-Length

@e5l e5l requested a review from bjhham November 25, 2024 15:11
@e5l e5l force-pushed the e5l/content-length-check branch 2 times, most recently from 39ab207 to 38620b5 Compare November 26, 2024 13:00
@e5l e5l force-pushed the e5l/content-length-check branch from 02848ff to 008f2d8 Compare November 27, 2024 15:27
@e5l e5l force-pushed the e5l/content-length-check branch from 8d91503 to ffad15b Compare November 28, 2024 09:42
@osipxd
Copy link
Member

osipxd commented Nov 28, 2024

JFYI, I've started updating Kotlin in a separate PR:

@e5l
Copy link
Member Author

e5l commented Nov 28, 2024

sure, I just can't merge this because of failing build. We need to wait for the new ktlint version

@e5l e5l changed the base branch from 3.1.0-eap to main November 29, 2024 09:12
@e5l e5l force-pushed the e5l/content-length-check branch from feffba1 to dc6e49c Compare November 29, 2024 09:49
@e5l e5l changed the title Revert removed content-length check KTOR-7828 Revert removed content-length check Nov 29, 2024
@e5l e5l force-pushed the e5l/content-length-check branch from 931d204 to 53d6485 Compare December 2, 2024 10:26
@e5l e5l merged commit f4bf505 into main Dec 2, 2024
14 checks passed
@e5l e5l deleted the e5l/content-length-check branch December 2, 2024 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants