Better singletons #172
Open
Better singletons #172
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
skylerkatz
reviewed
Sep 20, 2024
|
Just reviewed with Daniel. This will be a breaking change so we have to plan the release, but generally it's good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Originally, we implemented
AppliesToSingletonStateas the way of marking a state as a singleton. This is an artifact of how states were originally defined in early versions of Verbs. A much more straightforward approach is to just have aSingletonStateclass. This allows us to avoid passingsingleton: trueall over the place, and is just more obvious and simple.