Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

infra/rust/coverage: copy right toolchain sources #11501

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

When a project uses another toolchain than
nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
we should get sources from this other toolchain
@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DonggeLiu could this be taken in to fix suricata fuzzing coverage ? (and maybe other rust projects using a custom toolchain)

@DonggeLiu
Copy link
Contributor

Requesting help from @jonathanmetzman : )

@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun trial_build.py rust --fuzzing-engines libfuzzer --sanitizers address

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if testing passes.

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

So, gcb says this fixes suricata but breaks surrealdb

Looking into it

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got the fix easy.
oak is the other project using a custom rust version

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

friendly ping @jonathanmetzman as ClusterFuzz-External reminds me that suricata Coverage build is still failing ;-)

@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun trial_build.py rust --fuzzing-engines libfuzzer --sanitizers address

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

trial build all green :-)

@DonggeLiu
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathanmetzman is the CFLite failure related/expected to this PR?

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DonggeLiu this PR does not change anything for python ;-)

@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman merged commit 9e44290 into google:master Feb 7, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants