Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update display example #4507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Update display example #4507

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

jesserockz
Copy link
Member

Description:

Fix id -> it

Commit provided by @HopWorks

Related issue (if applicable): fixes

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

The previous yaml code had errors which I corrected here. It may not be all the errors. I did not test tall the code on the page.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the documentation for the ESPHome display component in the components/display/index.rst file. The changes focus on correcting method calls within code examples, specifically replacing id.filled_ring and id.filled_gauge with it.filled_ring and it.filled_gauge, respectively. These modifications ensure that the correct rendering engine object is referenced in the lambda functions, improving the accuracy of the documentation's code samples.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/display/index.rst Updated method calls in code examples:
- id.filled_ring()it.filled_ring()
- id.filled_gauge()it.filled_gauge()

The changes are purely documentation-related and do not affect the actual functionality of the ESPHome display component. The modifications aim to provide more accurate code examples for developers using the library.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f39ceef and 79a7c5c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/display/index.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
components/display/index.rst (1)

Pattern **: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/display/index.rst (1)

130-130: LGTM! Documentation update correctly changes id to it.

The changes accurately update the rendering engine object reference from id to it in the code examples, which matches the variable name introduced earlier in the documentation. This improves consistency and prevents confusion.

Let's verify there are no remaining instances of id. being used for rendering engine calls:

Also applies to: 133-133

✅ Verification successful

All rendering engine calls consistently use it instead of id

The verification confirms that all rendering engine method calls (filled_ring, print, line, rectangle, etc.) consistently use the it variable. No instances of incorrect id. prefixes for rendering methods were found in the display components documentation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'id.' being used for rendering engine calls
# Expected: No instances of 'id.' followed by rendering engine methods

# Search for potential incorrect rendering engine calls using 'id.'
rg 'id\.(filled_|print|line|rectangle|circle|triangle|polygon|draw_)' components/display/

# Search for the correct pattern to ensure examples consistently use 'it.'
rg 'it\.(filled_|print|line|rectangle|circle|triangle|polygon|draw_)' components/display/

Length of output: 12860


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 79a7c5c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/6761c84c5ac71f0008840177
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4507--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@jesserockz jesserockz merged commit 38ef940 into esphome:current Dec 17, 2024
3 checks passed
@jesserockz jesserockz mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants