Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: bump lru-cache from 6.0.0 to 10.2.0 #96

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 26, 2024

Bumps lru-cache from 6.0.0 to 10.2.0.

Changelog

Sourced from lru-cache's changelog.

10.2.0

  • types: implement the Map<K, V> interface

10.1.0

  • add cache.info(key) to get value as well as ttl and size information.

10.0.0

  • cache.fetch() return type is now Promise<V | undefined> instead of Promise<V | void>. This is an irrelevant change practically speaking, but can require changes for TypeScript users.

9.1.0

  • cache.set(key, undefined) is now an alias for cache.delete(key)

9.0.0

  • Use named export only, no default export.
  • Bring back minimal polyfill. If this polyfill ends up being used, then a warning is printed, as it is not safe for use outside of LRUCache.

8.0.0

  • The fetchContext option was renamed to context, and may no longer be set on the cache instance itself.
  • Rewritten in TypeScript, so pretty much all the types moved around a lot.
  • The AbortController/AbortSignal polyfill is removed. For this reason, Node version 16.14.0 or higher is now required.
  • Internal properties were moved to actual private class properties.
  • Keys and values must not be null or undefined.
  • Minified export available at 'lru-cache/min', for both CJS and MJS builds.

7.18.0

  • Add support for internal state investigation through the use of a status option to has(), set(), get(), and fetch().

7.17.0

  • Add signal option for fetch to pass a user-supplied

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [lru-cache](https://github.com/isaacs/node-lru-cache) from 6.0.0 to 10.2.0.
- [Changelog](https://github.com/isaacs/node-lru-cache/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](isaacs/node-lru-cache@v6.0.0...v10.2.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: lru-cache
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 26, 2024

The following labels could not be found: Dependencies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants