LibWeb: Add statusText validation for Response constructor #2870
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
F3n67u
force-pushed
the
response-status-text-validation
branch
from
35a120e to
feafef4
Compare
gmta
reviewed
Dec 11, 2024
Implemented validation to ensure `statusText` matches the `reason-phrase` token production. This change fixes a WPT subtest which I have imported.
F3n67u
force-pushed
the
response-status-text-validation
branch
from
feafef4 to
ae9cc95
Compare
ADKaster
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implemented validation to ensure
statusTextmatches thereason-phrasetoken production.This change fixes a WPT subtest which I have imported.