-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v2.1.0 #196
v2.1.0 #196
Conversation
WARNING: systemd-1_255.4-r0 do_install: Using /home/root as root user's home directory is not fully supported by systemd Set ROOT_HOME to "/root" to avoid such warning. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
This patch add to recipe INHIBIT_PACKAGE_DEBUG_SPLIT="1" this change force system not to build debug packages and do strip of executables to remove TMPDIR from binary file. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
This patch add to recipe INHIBIT_PACKAGE_DEBUG_SPLIT="1" this change force system not to build debug packages and do strip of executables to remove TMPDIR from binary file. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
golang is adding path if GO_PATH is created and removing this and adding -trimpath to build process should remove path inside binary Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
remove CONFIG_INTEL_MENLOW & CONFIG_EFI_VARS are deprecated add CONFIG_EFIVAR_FS=y This patch enables new interface for depraceted sysfs one is compatible with previous one. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
This patch fixes: WARNING: wolfssl-5.7.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/lib/libwolfssl.so.42.1.0 in package wolfssl contains reference to TMPDIR [buildpaths] Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
WARNING: gcab-1.6-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/src/debug/gcab/1.6/libgcab/gcab-enums.c in package gcab-src contains reference to TMPDIR [buildpaths] Disable QA checkout for this package: do_package_qa[noexec] = "1" Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzygłód <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Fix build warnings on DTS #833
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniil Klimuk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniil Klimuk <[email protected]>
Add UEFI Capsule update support
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
…ls packages Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
There is something wrong with workflow or runner: If you close/reopen PR or add new commit then either one of those jobs would start (and next one would probably wait forever again). At least that's what happened when I tried it. Workflows:
Edit: Problem was fixed here: actions/runner#3609 (comment) |
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
dts-scripts: Bump Optiplex version to 0.1.1
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
Fixes mistake made in f5b42d1 Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michał Iwanicki <[email protected]>
@m-iwanicki Can you check if everything is fine here? (aside from CI) |
I did 2 weeks ago: #196 (review) and #196 (comment). Except changelog everything else looks ok. |
And check if this is correct srcrev and all changes are in changelog: 629bc4c |
@m-iwanicki I fixed the changelog. The srcrev looks alright and it seems that the changes are visible in the Changelog. |
@PLangowski Are we following release process from https://docs.zarhus.com/development-process/standard-release-process/#process-steps? If yes then what about |
@m-iwanicki since this will be the first release that publishes its manifest, I think we should use the script in the next release, where we will have 2 "official" manifests to compare. |
Signed-off-by: Pawel Langowski <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.