fix error with poll #22
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update introduces enhancements to game logic and modifies the save function's execution order. It focuses on adding functionality for better handling of player outcomes, spectator management, role counting, player distribution validation, and victory condition checks. Additionally, it reorganizes the save process for more logical data handling and efficiency. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/data_models/Game.py (2 hunks)
- src/handlers/save.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/data_models/Game.py (4)
20-21: LGTM! Removing spectators from the outcomes counter is a clean and straightforward approach.
23-42: Ensure the role strings match exactly with those generated during gameplay.This is crucial for the accuracy of role counting. If there's any discrepancy in the strings used here and elsewhere in the codebase, it could lead to incorrect role counts.
60-77: The check for mutually exclusive victory conditions is logically sound.However, consider the potential for future game rule changes that might affect these conditions.
78-104: Thevalidate_resultsmethod is comprehensive and covers various game outcomes.Ensure that all possible game outcomes are accounted for and that the strings used for comparison are consistent throughout the application.
src/handlers/save.py (1)
109-109: Moving thestop_pollcall before creating theGameinstance is a logical change that can prevent potential race conditions.Ensure that this change has been tested thoroughly, especially in scenarios where stopping the poll might fail.
counter init ref Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
better error message while rules are broken Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/data_models/Game.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/data_models/Game.py (6)
16-17: Consider adding a docstring to theextract_player_outcomesmethod to explain its purpose and the expected format of the input and output.
19-20: Theremove_spectatorsmethod effectively removes the spectator entry. Ensure that "👀 SPECTATOR | NOT A PLAYER 👀" is consistently used across the application to avoid key errors.Verification successful
The search results confirm that the string "👀 SPECTATOR | NOT A PLAYER 👀" is used consistently across the application in
Game.py,Record.py, andconfig.py. This suggests that the application maintains a consistent approach to identifying or handling spectator-related data, aligning with the concern raised in the review comment. Therefore, the review comment is verified as the application appears to use this string consistently to avoid key errors.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the spectator string across the project to ensure consistency. rg "👀 SPECTATOR | NOT A PLAYER 👀"Length of output: 263
22-41: Thecount_player_rolesmethod is clear and concise. However, consider using a more descriptive variable name thantotal_hitlers,total_liberals, andtotal_fasciststo improve readability.
43-57: The error message invalidate_player_distributioncould be more informative. Consider incorporating the previous suggestion to include detailed error information.
59-76: Thecheck_mutually_exclusive_victory_conditionsmethod correctly identifies invalid game states. Adding a docstring would enhance understandability.
77-103: In thevalidate_resultsmethod, consider adding error handling for unexpected outcomes in theresultstuple to ensure robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/data_models/Game.py (2 hunks)
- src/data_models/Record.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/data_models/Game.py (6)
17-18: LGTM! Efficient use of a generator expression withinCounter.
21-22: LGTM! Proper handling of spectator removal.
25-44: LGTM! Correct and clear counting of player roles.
47-62: LGTM! Detailed error message enhances debugging.
65-80: LGTM! Proper validation of mutually exclusive victory conditions.
86-118: LGTM! Comprehensive validation and outcome determination.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Record.pyfile to correctly identify team types based on player outcomes.