Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark the repo as unmaintained and archive it #32

Open
fatso83 opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Mark the repo as unmaintained and archive it #32

fatso83 opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@fatso83
Copy link

fatso83 commented Nov 20, 2021

Even though this seems like the most frequently updated package for Jest teamcity reporters, this repo has not been updated since 2018, PRs are lying dormant and the docs are outdated. It would be better if this was clearly marked on the front page, possibly linking to alternatives like an actively updated alternative like jest-teamcity (15 K downloads/week) or a package that simply uses the JUnit compatible output (like jest-junit (about 1.6 M downloads/week)

@Maxim-Zabunkov
Copy link

HI there, we still use this package and recently found an issue
I checked proposed jest-teamcity and figured out it lacks code coverage reporting code - so it simply does not fit

@fatso83
Copy link
Author

fatso83 commented Dec 5, 2022

@Maxim-Zabunkov Code coverage is generated by jest itself and jest-junit does a fine job of creating the junit xml files.

When running jest --ci --coverage I get a nice coverage-final.json JSON file with stats on each file. This is built-in.

@Maxim-Zabunkov
Copy link

Maxim-Zabunkov commented Apr 11, 2023

@fatso83, looks like you did't understand the gap I mentioned.
TeamCity has a built-in ability to render code coverage stats in overview + it collects historical trends.
So we need to post those stats using service messages and TeamCity will take care of the rest.
jest-teamcity plugin should post those data from generated jest coverage results.

@fatso83
Copy link
Author

fatso83 commented Apr 11, 2023

Probably right about that. We had stopped using TC by the time I created that last comment anyhow 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants