You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a suspicion that using text/event-stream with CompressiomStream could cause delays in delivering events to consumers but I'm not sure that's true or not. It seems to me that after enqueing some event(s)/chunk(s) that the compression stream could be in a waiting state for more bytes to compress before it enques corresponding compressed chunk(s).
Is some flush() method needed in order to reliably send a compressed stream of events and to guarantee that individual events are not delayed?
Is there an expected flushing strategy for browsers to implement today for CompressionStream or is it undefined? If it is already "always" then I'm set for my current use cases but I'm guessing that is not the case. I wonder if there is an expected flushing strategy with which I might be able to find a workaround. Thank you.
Sorry, it is implementation-dependant at the moment. I don't think there's a good workaround. We should make it a priority to fix #22 once the migration from WICG to WHATWG is done.
I have a suspicion that using
text/event-stream
withCompressiomStream
could cause delays in delivering events to consumers but I'm not sure that's true or not. It seems to me that after enqueing some event(s)/chunk(s) that the compression stream could be in a waiting state for more bytes to compress before it enques corresponding compressed chunk(s).Is some
flush()
method needed in order to reliably send a compressed stream of events and to guarantee that individual events are not delayed?Demo: https://dash.deno.com/playground/event-stream-example
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: