Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default semantics #132

Open
druide opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Default semantics #132

druide opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@druide
Copy link

druide commented Jun 20, 2024

Problem

When you first get acquainted with the library, it is difficult to get that you need to write your own CapabilitySemantics.
I propose to make some default and general semantic as a reference. Between, on my mind, verification semantics should be standardized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant