Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Add Labeler to Enable Automatic Labeling #3653

Open
4 tasks done
AdityyaX opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4151
Open
4 tasks done

[CI] Add Labeler to Enable Automatic Labeling #3653

AdityyaX opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4151

Comments

@AdityyaX
Copy link
Contributor

Current Behavior

Currently, our repository lacks an automated labeler implemented through a labeler.yml configuration file. This means that when contributors create new issues or pull requests, there is no automated process to apply appropriate labels based on predefined criteria.

Desired Behavior

By utilizing a labeler.yml file, we hope to improve the workflow of our repository by providing an automatic labeler. With this enhancement, labels will be applied to problems and pull requests more smoothly, simplifying the classification process and improving insight into the types of contributions.

Implementation

To create a GitHub Actions workflow for a label

Acceptance Tests

GitHub action should work successfully

Checklist

  • I have read and followed the project's code of conduct.
  • I have searched for similar issues before creating this one.
  • I have provided all the necessary information to understand and reproduce the issue.
  • I am willing to contribute to the resolution of this issue.

Thank you for contributing to our project! We appreciate your help in improving it.

📚 See contributing instructions.

🙋🏾🙋🏼 Questions: Community Matrix Server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant