Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove LiteLLM and build native implementation #348

Open
lukehinds opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Remove LiteLLM and build native implementation #348

lukehinds opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@lukehinds
Copy link
Contributor

While LiteLLM is very useful (huge coverage of providers), we always invariably hit issues around certain idiomatic approaches taken by LiteLLM, and feel we need to take a different approach. It therefore makes sense to build our own native implementation

If possible, we should initially seek to support both LiteLLM and the CodeGate implementation (if viable and not to heavy a lift).

@lukehinds lukehinds added feature and removed feature labels Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant