Relicense uefi-rs under dual MIT/Apache-2.0

[nicholasbishop]

To improve compatibility with the Rust ecosystem, we are planning to relicense all the code in the uefi-rs repo under the MIT/Apache-2.0 licenses.

This will affect the uefi-raw, uefi-macros, and uefi crates, as well as all other code in this repo.

We need all contributors to agree to this license. (If any contributors do not agree, we may still proceed with the relicense, but with those contributions removed.) Note that this relicensing will not affect existing releases; they will always be available under the existing MPL-2.0 license.

To agree to this relicense, please leave a comment with the following message:

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

Thanks all for your help with this!

Contributors

• @3than3
• @AdrianDanis
• @Andy-Python-Programmer
• @AtsukiTak
• @BinaryTENSHi
• @Bobo1239
• @ColinFinck
• @Freax13
• @FredrikAleksander
• @GabrielMajeri
• @HTGAzureX1212
• @HadrienG2
• @IsaacWoods
• @JarlEvanson
• @JeffLi01
• @JohnAZoidberg
• @JonahPlusPlus
• @LightAndLight
• @MaulingMonkey
• @NathanRoyer
• @RaitoBezarius
• @Redrield
• @StevenDoesStuffs
• @Stzx
• @YtvwlD
• @andre-braga
• @baloo
• @bjadamson
• @bjorn3
• @blitz
• @cmoylan
• @ctrlaltmilk
• @d-sonuga
• @dependabot-preview[bot]
• @dependabot[bot]
• @devsnek
• @diekmann
• @e820
• @edigaryev
• @felipebalbi
• @foxcob
• @gelven4sec
• @gil0mendes
• @gurry
• @gz
• @hughsie
• @iankronquist
• @imtsuki
• @josephlr
• @julic20s
• @kendase3
• @liferooter
• @medhefgo
• @necauqua
• @nicholasbishop
• @nkaretnikov
• @nsemmel
• @ocadaruma
• @pavlus
• @phil-opp
• @phip1611
• @pratyai
• @raccog
• @renovate[bot]
• @rexlunae
• @roblabla
• @sagudev
• @sdemos
• @sky5454
• @sreehax
• @stevefan1999-personal
• @stillinbeta
• @supdrewin
• @timrobertsdev
• @toku-sa-n
• @tomoyat1
• @upsuper
• @veluca93
• @wangrunji0408
• @zdivelbiss
• @zhangpf

[nicholasbishop]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[Freax13]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[JarlEvanson]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[gz]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[baloo]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[Andy-Python-Programmer]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[Bobo1239]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[RaitoBezarius]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option. Le dim. 10 nov. 2024, 23:34, Boris-Chengbiao Zhou ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1470 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACMZRCHE53LQDEO7S3TOUTZ77NRBAVCNFSM6AAAAABRQUKIHWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRWHE3DKMJYGQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[HTGAzureX1212]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[ctrlaltmilk]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[bjadamson]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[nicholasbishop]

(I think Github only pinged the first 50 names in the description, so pinging the rest here.)

To improve compatibility with the Rust ecosystem, we are planning to relicense all the code in the uefi-rs repo under the MIT/Apache-2.0 licenses.

To agree to this relicense, please leave a comment with the following message:

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

• @liferooter
• @medhefgo
• @necauqua
• @nicholasbishop
• @nkaretnikov
• @nsemmel
• @ocadaruma
• @pavlus
• @phil-opp
• @phip1611
• @pratyai
• @raccog
• @renovate[bot]
• @rexlunae
• @roblabla
• @sagudev
• @sdemos
• @sky5454
• @sreehax
• @stevefan1999-personal
• @stillinbeta
• @supdrewin
• @timrobertsdev
• @toku-sa-n
• @tomoyat1
• @upsuper
• @veluca93
• @wangrunji0408
• @zdivelbiss
• @zhangpf

[roblabla]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[toku-sa-n]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[veluca93]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[upsuper]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[LightAndLight]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[stevefan1999-personal]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[pratyai]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[ocadaruma]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[iankronquist]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option Ian Kronquist

…

On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 14:17 Nicholas Bishop ***@***.***> wrote: To improve compatibility with the Rust ecosystem, we are planning to relicense all the code in the uefi-rs repo under the MIT/Apache-2.0 licenses. This will affect the uefi-raw, uefi-macros, and uefi crates, as well as all other code in this repo. We need all contributors to agree to this license. (If any contributors do not agree, we may still proceed with the relicense, but with those contributions removed.) Note that this relicensing will not affect existing releases; they will always be available under the existing MPL-2.0 license. To agree to this relicense, please leave a comment with the following message: I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option. Thanks all for your help with this! Contributors - @3than3 <https://github.com/3than3> - @AdrianDanis <https://github.com/AdrianDanis> - @Andy-Python-Programmer <https://github.com/Andy-Python-Programmer> - @AtsukiTak <https://github.com/AtsukiTak> - @BinaryTENSHi <https://github.com/BinaryTENSHi> - @Bobo1239 <https://github.com/Bobo1239> - @ColinFinck <https://github.com/ColinFinck> - @Freax13 <https://github.com/Freax13> - @FredrikAleksander <https://github.com/FredrikAleksander> - @GabrielMajeri <https://github.com/GabrielMajeri> - @HTGAzureX1212 <https://github.com/HTGAzureX1212> - @HadrienG2 <https://github.com/HadrienG2> - @IsaacWoods <https://github.com/IsaacWoods> - @JarlEvanson <https://github.com/JarlEvanson> - @JeffLi01 <https://github.com/JeffLi01> - @JohnAZoidberg <https://github.com/JohnAZoidberg> - @JonahPlusPlus <https://github.com/JonahPlusPlus> - @LightAndLight <https://github.com/LightAndLight> - @MaulingMonkey <https://github.com/MaulingMonkey> - @NathanRoyer <https://github.com/NathanRoyer> - @RaitoBezarius <https://github.com/RaitoBezarius> - @Redrield <https://github.com/Redrield> - @Stzx <https://github.com/Stzx> - @YtvwlD <https://github.com/YtvwlD> - @andre-braga <https://github.com/andre-braga> - @baloo <https://github.com/baloo> - @bjadamson <https://github.com/bjadamson> - @bjorn3 <https://github.com/bjorn3> - @blitz <https://github.com/blitz> - @cmoylan <https://github.com/cmoylan> - @ctrlaltmilk <https://github.com/ctrlaltmilk> - @d-sonuga <https://github.com/d-sonuga> - @dependabot-preview <https://github.com/dependabot-preview>[bot] - @dependabot <https://github.com/dependabot>[bot] - @devsnek <https://github.com/devsnek> - @diekmann <https://github.com/diekmann> - @e820 <https://github.com/e820> - @edigaryev <https://github.com/edigaryev> - @felipebalbi <https://github.com/felipebalbi> - @foxcob <https://github.com/foxcob> - @gelven4sec <https://github.com/gelven4sec> - @gil0mendes <https://github.com/gil0mendes> - @gurry <https://github.com/gurry> - @gz <https://github.com/gz> - @hughsie <https://github.com/hughsie> - @iankronquist <https://github.com/iankronquist> - @imtsuki <https://github.com/imtsuki> - @josephlr <https://github.com/josephlr> - @julic20s <https://github.com/julic20s> - @kendase3 <https://github.com/kendase3> - @liferooter - @medhefgo - @necauqua - @nicholasbishop - @nkaretnikov - @nsemmel - @ocadaruma - @pavlus - @phil-opp - @phip1611 - @pratyai - @raccog - @renovate[bot] - @rexlunae - @roblabla - @sagudev - @sdemos - @sky5454 - @sreehax - @stevefan1999-personal - @stillinbeta - @supdrewin - @timrobertsdev - @toku-sa-n - @tomoyat1 - @upsuper - @veluca93 - @wangrunji0408 - @zdivelbiss - @zhangpf — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1470>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHTVIINLYF7MP4FJZ2C2K3Z77LRFAVCNFSM6AAAAABRQUKIHWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGY2DONZQG44DMOI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zdivelbiss]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[gelven4sec]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[raccog]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[felipebalbi]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[timrobertsdev]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[e820]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[JonahPlusPlus]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[StevenDoesStuffs]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[nkaretnikov]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[diekmann]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[Stzx]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[blitz]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[IsaacWoods]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[wangrunji0408]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[NathanRoyer]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[andre-braga]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[josephlr]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[AtsukiTak]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[foxcob]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[kendase3]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[Redrield]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[tomoyat1]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

---

Thank you to the maintainers for all of their dedicated work!

[cmoylan]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[3than3]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[sdemos]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[stillinbeta]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[nicholasbishop]

Friendly ping! We are still looking for sign-off from the following contributors:

@AdrianDanis
@FredrikAleksander
@JeffLi01
@YtvwlD
@imtsuki
@medhefgo
@nsemmel
@pavlus
@rexlunae
@sky5454
@supdrewin
@zhangpf

[AdrianDanis]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[FredrikAleksander]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[YtvwlD]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

(Even though I think copyleft licenses are better.)

[imtsuki]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[nsemmel]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[crawfxrd]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

[nicholasbishop]

Friendly ping! We are still looking for sign-off from the following contributors:

@JeffLi01
@medhefgo
@pavlus
@rexlunae
@sky5454
@supdrewin
@zhangpf

[rexlunae]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

• @rexlunae

[JeffLi01]

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.