-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
Issues: pydata/patsy
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Feature request: "target ~ ." syntax
well-defined-task-definitely-do-this
#10
opened Oct 29, 2012 by
szs8
Introducing
formulaic
, a high-performance patsy
"competitor"
#157
opened Jul 6, 2020 by
matthewwardrop
Update "Differences between R and Patsy Formulas" to state that dot on RHS is not supported
#134
opened Oct 22, 2018 by
tmelconian
Patsy prints uninformative error message when user places "Intercept" in a formula
#14
opened Feb 4, 2013 by
setjmp
Maximum recursion depth error for formulas with more than 485 terms
fixed in formulaic
#18
opened Apr 12, 2013 by
szs8
Accept to use variable and categorical variable from dataframe index
#211
opened Oct 9, 2024 by
rknyip
Need a way to request the LHS of a formula to *not* go through design matrix processing
statsmodels-request
#62
opened Apr 14, 2015 by
njsmith
Implement an option for factor-based prediction
statsmodels-request
well-defined-task-definitely-do-this
#63
opened Apr 14, 2015 by
njsmith
Add "partial prediction" (initially at the factor level)
statsmodels-request
well-defined-task-definitely-do-this
#64
opened Apr 14, 2015 by
njsmith
How to use mutli-column functions in Patsy which return categorical output?
#79
opened Mar 6, 2016 by
napsternxg
Previous Next
ProTip!
Updated in the last three days: updated:>2024-12-19.