Traditionally, Python packages were organized into a hierarchical structure with modules and subpackages being located inside the parent package directory. When submodules are imported, they are represented as attributes on the parent module. Consider the following session:
>>> import sphinx.addnodes
>>> sphinx
<module 'sphinx' from '/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sphinx/__init__.py'>
>>> sphinx.addnodes
<module 'sphinx.addnodes' from '/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sphinx/addnodes.py'>
This works fine most of the time. However, it start being problematic when multiple Gentoo packages install parts of the same top-level package. This may happen e.g. with some plugin layouts where plugins are installed inside the package. More commonly, it happens when upstream wishes all their packages to start with a common component.
This is the case with Zope framework. Different Zope packages share
common zope
top-level package. dev-python/zope-interface
installs into zope.interface
, dev-python/zope-event
into zope.event
. For this to work using the hierarchical layout,
a common package has to install zope/__init__.py
, then other Zope
packages have to depend on it and install sub-packages inside that
directory. As far as installed packages are concerned, this is entirely
doable.
The real problem happens when we wish to test a freshly built package
that depends on an installed package. In that case, Python imports
zope
from build directory that contains only zope.interface
.
It will not be able to import zope.event
that is installed in system
package directory:
>>> import zope.interface
>>> zope
<module 'zope' from '/tmp/portage/dev-python/zope-interface-4.7.1/work/zope.interface-4.7.1-python3_8/lib/zope/__init__.py'>
>>> zope.interface
<module 'zope.interface' from '/tmp/portage/dev-python/zope-interface-4.7.1/work/zope.interface-4.7.1-python3_8/lib/zope/interface/__init__.py'>
>>> import zope.event
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'zope.event'
Now, this could be worked around by copying all other subpackages back to the build directory. However, there is a better solution.
Unlike traditional packages, namespace packages act as a kind of proxy.
They are not strictly bound to the containing directory, and instead
permit loading subpackages from all directories found in module search
path. If we make zope
a namespace package, we can import both
the locally built zope.interface
and system zope.event
packages:
>>> import zope.interface
>>> import zope.event
>>> zope
<module 'zope' (namespace)>
>>> zope.interface
<module 'zope.interface' from '/tmp/portage/dev-python/zope-interface-4.7.1/work/zope.interface-4.7.1-python3_8/lib/zope/interface/__init__.py'>
>>> zope.event
<module 'zope.event' from '/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/zope/event/__init__.py'>
There are three common methods of creating namespace packages:
- PEP 420 namespaces implemented in Python 3.3 and newer,
- Using pkgutil standard library module,
- Using namespace package support in setuptools (discouraged).
PEP 420 namespaces are created implicitly when a package directory
does not contain __init__.py
file. While earlier versions
of Python (including Python 2.7) ignored such directories and did not
permit importing Python modules within them, Python 3.3 imports such
directories as namespace packages.
pkgutil namespaces use __init__.py
with the following content:
__path__ = __import__('pkgutil').extend_path(__path__, __name__)
setuptools namespace can use __init__.py
with the following
content:
__import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__)
Alternatively, setuptools normally installs a .pth
file that is
automatically loaded by Python and implicitly injects the namespace
into Python.
Both pkgutil and setuptools namespaces are portable to all versions of Python.
More general information on the topic can be found under packaging namespace packages in Python Packaging User Guide.
The exact method of detecting namespace packages depends on the type of namespace used.
PEP 420 namespaces can generally be recognized by the lack
of __init__.py
in an installed package directory. However, since
they do not require any specific action, distinguishing them is not very
important.
pkgutil namespaces can be recognized through the content of their
__init__.py
. Generally, you should find it suspicious if it is
the only file in a top-level package directory, and if the name of this
directory is less specific than the package name (e.g. zope
for
zope.interface
, ruamel
for ruamel.yaml
). If you miss this,
then you will learn about it when the __init__.py
file collides
between multiple packages.
setuptools namespaces usually do not install __init__.py
but
do install a .pth
file instead. Prior to installation, they can
also be recognized by namespace_packages
option in setup.py
or setup.cfg
. However, some packages use a custom __init__.py
file that does enable setuptools namespaces.
If the package uses PEP 420 namespaces, no special action is required.
Per PEP 420 layout, the package must not install __init__.py
files
for namespaces.
If the package uses the regular setuptools namespace install method
(i.e. namespace_packages
option), then the eclass detects that
and strips the namespaces automatically, e.g.:
* python3_11: running distutils-r1_run_phase distutils-r1_python_install
* Stripping pkg_resources-style namespace ruamel
* Stripping pkg_resources-style namespace ruamel.std
If the package uses pkgutil-style or setuptools-style namespaces
via __init__.py
files, these files need to be removed manually.
This is done after the PEP 517 build phase:
python_compile() {
distutils-r1_python_compile
rm "${BUILD_DIR}/install$(python_get_sitedir)"/jaraco/__init__.py || die
}
Note that in some extreme cases, upstream combines namespace support
and other code in the __init__.py
file. Naturally, this file cannot
be removed. No good solution has been found for this problem yet.
Some packages include an explicit setuptools
runtime dependency
(install_requires
) when using namespaces. If this is the only
use of pkg_resources
and setuptools
in installed package
sources, this dependency needs to be stripped, e.g.:
src_prepare() {
# strip rdep specific to namespaces
sed -i -e "/'setuptools'/d" setup.py || die
distutils-r1_src_prepare
}
Historically, Gentoo has used dev-python/namespace-*
packages
to support namespaces. This method is deprecated and it is in process
of being retired.