Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

@import with layer gets reordered before @layer and changes the behavior #567

Open
sapphi-red opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@sapphi-red
Copy link

@layer reset, bootstrap;
@import url('https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/css/bootstrap.css') layer(bootstrap);

@layer reset {
  h1 {
    margin-top: 100px;
  }
}

This input is transformed into:

@import url('https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/css/bootstrap.css') layer(bootstrap);
@layer reset, bootstrap;
@layer reset {
  h1 {
    margin-top: 100px;
  }
}

But the output CSS has a different meaning from the input CSS (bootstrap layer is now overridden with reset layer).

Reproduction: https://stackblitz.com/edit/template-sapphi-red-postcss-sass-kasrpt?file=src%2Finput.css,postcss.js

@romainmenke
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for reporting this @sapphi-red

This is a rather complex issue and will require a substantial rewrite.
Is this an effort that Vite could support financially?


fyi: this issue doesn't exist in @csstools/postcss-bundler

But there I didn't implement a lot of non-standard behavior nor did I provide any of the customization options that exist in postcss-import.

@csstools/postcss-bundler isn't suitable for Vite but it does show that this issue is solvable :)

@sapphi-red
Copy link
Author

Hi, we had sponsored the PostCSS organization through VoidZero via OpenCollective last month to collectively support the PostCSS ecosystem, which I think includes this repo too. We avoid providing financial support for specific issues or pull requests. We do this to avoid the possibility that financial support might cause merging to become a goal in itself, which would remove the long-term perspective and put pressure on library maintainers. Therefore, we prefer to provide financial support to library organizations. I hope you're able to claim your refactoring efforts from OpenCollective. Thanks for your work here!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants