You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The idea would be to give a bonus to "brave" MEPs, the ones who do things with a higher personal cost, to try to give them a better feedback and encourages them to do it more often.
For instance, voting against their groups. If a group votes, in its great majority (like 80% of votes for instance) and only one or two meps vote the other way around, their score should be multiplied by 1.5 or 2 for instance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
okhin: I've created a ticket for multiplier bonuses
okhin: (or aluses … after all if a MEP votes alone against his group, while his groups voted in the way we wanted … then he muste be refrained of doing it again :)
njoyard: hehe
njoyard: I'll think about a way to do it automatically
okhin: yep, you might need to have an API to get the position of a group
okhin: (like this group voted "70% Y, 20%N, 10%A"
okhin: or to have a group similarity index
okhin: (this meps tends to vote like is group or not)
okhin: might be intersting to correlate with different group (they vote the same way of their group, and never like their comissions)
okhin: can be interesting to have emergence of meps who just push the buttons their told
okhin: and the one who are self-aware
okhin: and can also be useful like "with ADLE? we need to focus on the head because they'll follow the leaders, while with Greens they have less group discipline, so we can target individuals more easily)
The idea would be to give a bonus to "brave" MEPs, the ones who do things with a higher personal cost, to try to give them a better feedback and encourages them to do it more often.
For instance, voting against their groups. If a group votes, in its great majority (like 80% of votes for instance) and only one or two meps vote the other way around, their score should be multiplied by 1.5 or 2 for instance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: