Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a multiplier bonus to some specific situations #111

Open
okhin opened this issue Jul 25, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Add a multiplier bonus to some specific situations #111

okhin opened this issue Jul 25, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@okhin
Copy link
Contributor

okhin commented Jul 25, 2016

The idea would be to give a bonus to "brave" MEPs, the ones who do things with a higher personal cost, to try to give them a better feedback and encourages them to do it more often.

For instance, voting against their groups. If a group votes, in its great majority (like 80% of votes for instance) and only one or two meps vote the other way around, their score should be multiplied by 1.5 or 2 for instance.

@njoyard
Copy link
Member

njoyard commented Jul 26, 2016

For reference:

okhin: I've created a ticket for multiplier bonuses
okhin: (or aluses … after all if a MEP votes alone against his group, while his groups voted in the way we wanted … then he muste be refrained of doing it again :)
njoyard: hehe
njoyard: I'll think about a way to do it automatically
okhin: yep, you might need to have an API to get the position of a group
okhin: (like this group voted "70% Y, 20%N, 10%A"
okhin: or to have a group similarity index
okhin: (this meps tends to vote like is group or not)
okhin: might be intersting to correlate with different group (they vote the same way of their group, and never like their comissions)
okhin: can be interesting to have emergence of meps who just push the buttons their told
okhin: and the one who are self-aware
okhin: and can also be useful like "with ADLE? we need to focus on the head because they'll follow the leaders, while with Greens they have less group discipline, so we can target individuals more easily)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants