Looking for a suggested "default" backend when using OTLP exporters #3816
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
Our demo uses opensearch for logs. We can use that? And prom/grafana for metrics (demo already use that). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
if the goal is to just verify that OTLPExporter is setup correctly and it works, then collector with stdout/debug exporter is sufficient IMHO! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would say prometheus for metrics, for logs I'm unsure (and unopinionated right now). OpenSearch isn't bad as per @cijothomas's suggestion? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So, I looked into the OpenSearch documentation and the basic setup is already ... complicated: https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/quickstart/ If we compare that to jaeger & prometheus where one simply starts an "all-in-one" docker container, this is a lot of effort for quickly taking a look at your metrics. I have no idea about OpenSearch but maybe there is an equivalent where I can get a single container up and running? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
More and more languages provide support for metrics & logs, our current documentations for exporters recommend jaeger to verify OTLP for traces, but right now there is no immediate option for logs & metrics. We could suggest that people setup a collector and look at their telemetry with a logging exporter, but it would be nice to have something visual like open-telemetry/oteps#230 suggests.
for reference: #3144 (comment)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions