Is using raw schema types a good idea?

[Bobrokus]

Is using types right from schema a good idea?

e.g. instead of

 #[cynic::schema("shopify")]
pub mod schema {}

pub struct ProductSetPayload {
	// ...
}

#[derive(cynic::QueryFragment, Debug)]
#[cynic(graphql_type = "Mutation", variables = "SetProductVariables")]
pub struct SetProduct {
    #[arguments(input: $input)]
    // local ProductSetPayload struct
    pub product_set: Option<ProductSetPayload>,
}

I write

#[cynic::schema("shopify")]
pub mod schema {}

#[derive(cynic::QueryFragment, Debug)]
#[cynic(graphql_type = "Mutation", variables = "SetProductVariables")]
pub struct SetProduct {
    #[arguments(input: $input)]
    // ProductSetPayload struct from `schema`
    pub product_set: Option<schema::ProductSetPayload>,
}

[obmarg]

I wouldn't expect that to work, and even if it did it would not be much use. The types in the schema all look something like struct ProductSetPayload; - they don't have any fields on them, they're just there to help me enforce some things via the type system.

[Bobrokus]

I wouldn't expect that to work, and even if it did it would not be much use. The types in the schema all look something like struct ProductSetPayload; - they don't have any fields on them, they're just there to help me enforce some things via the type system.

Yea my monkey brain realized that. That's why I closed the issue