Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clicking on container names does nothing #95

Open
joestump opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Clicking on container names does nothing #95

joestump opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
implemented Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@joestump
Copy link
Contributor

joestump commented Jul 8, 2024

The URL is http://AppLink:AppPort, but I couldn't find AppLink or AppPort in the code and they don't appear to be common labels in Docker or anything. Is it possible to set these somehow for containers not deployed through DweebUI?

@lllllllillllllillll
Copy link
Owner

This is fixed in v0.70-dev, which allows you to set a custom IP address or domain name in Settings.

@lllllllillllllillll lllllllillllllillll self-assigned this Jul 9, 2024
@lllllllillllllillll lllllllillllllillll added the implemented Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 9, 2024
@lllllllillllllillll
Copy link
Owner

@joestump If you're curious about where the code is:
The container card is views/partials/containerFull.html.
Then in controllers/dashboard.js it replaces "AppLink" with either localhost or the custom link.

@xuqingkuang
Copy link

This is fixed in v0.70-dev, which allows you to set a custom IP address or domain name in Settings.

Does it mean that DweebUI could be a service startup program that functions as a service portal?

It's recommended that the AppLink could load from the hostname of current URL by default, and the AppPort could load from the mapped host port.

@lllllllillllllillll
Copy link
Owner

Does it mean that DweebUI could be a service startup program that functions as a service portal?

Yeah. I need to expand on options for container cards links. I like the idea of splitting up the link.

bcurran3 (#14) suggested using container labels to generate the links.

@xuqingkuang
Copy link

Yeah, you may can try the implementation of https://casaos.io/. It's running on my debian.

The CasaOS aims to be a NAS system, but my system doesn't require the harddrive management features, and the container management feature isn't powerful enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
implemented Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants