-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature request: socket topology #1599
Comments
I'm also not seeing basics about number of physical vs logical cores - that seems obvious like it should be here? |
The node labels are not suitable for describing detailed hardware topology. I also think that the NodeFeature CRD isn't a very good at that. There's a separate What is your use case for this request? How are you planning to consume the information? |
I’m working on the compatibility specification for OCI and building extractor plugins and tools, for Kubernetes but also HPC. For a lot of HPC applications we want to know the detailed topology to best schedule work. https://www-hpc.cea.fr/tgcc-public/en/html/toc/fulldoc/Process_distribution_affinity_binding.html |
It could be that hwloc is a better fit for this - I found a library in go but it has a bug so I opened an issue. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
hiya! I'm looking to get a mapping of which cores belong to which socket, akin to what hwloc does: https://www.open-mpi.org/projects/hwloc/doc/v0.9.3/
Right now it looks like nfd exposes a cpu -> topology.socket_count which is great, but doesn't tell us about the topology. Would this be possible? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: