You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
would be great to be able to easilly extract an abstact type (interface) from a type with a public member, and have it implement (interface with) that interface,
with just 1 context action.
Reason
interfaces in F# look quite odd, due to type signatures differing from actual implementation signatures, this confuses quite many people getting started with F# i believe
// LIGHT BULB HERE ---> extract all public members to interface, also useful..typeTripFaqMapper(...)=// LIGHT BULB HERE! --> here suggestion lights up, as this is a public member, possibly can be extracted to interfacememberthis.MapGroupTagAsync(id:int64,groupCode:string,tag:string,appId:string,locale,currency,cancellationToken:CancellationToken):TravixFaqResponse Task =task{...}// implementation// generates this, like in C# extract interface..typeTripFaqMapper(...)=interface ITripFaqMapper withmemberthis.MapGroupTagAsync(id:int64,groupCode:string,tag:string,appId:string,locale,currency,cancellationToken:CancellationToken):TravixFaqResponse Task =task{...}// implementationtypeITripFaqMapper=abstractmemberMapGroupTagAsync:
id: int64 *
groupCode: string *
tag: string *
appId: string *
locale: Locale *
currency: Currency *
cancellationToken: CancellationToken ->
TravixFaqResponse Task
interfaces are only part of OO world, but having a great time C# interoperability should be always important and useful
helps .NET developers be less scared of F# to also know they can easilly make regular class types with interfaces and inject them in their DI containers of habit, like what is provided in HostBuilder and Aspnetcore by default.
Checklist
I have looked through existing issues to make sure that this feature has not been requested before
I have provided a descriptive title for this issue
I am aware that even valid feature requests may be rejected if they do not align with the project's goals
I or my company would be willing to contribute this feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Details
would be great to be able to easilly extract an abstact type (interface) from a type with a public member, and have it implement (interface with) that interface,
with just 1 context action.
Reason
interfaces are only part of OO world, but having a great time C# interoperability should be always important and useful
helps .NET developers be less scared of F# to also know they can easilly make regular class types with interfaces and inject them in their DI containers of habit, like what is provided in HostBuilder and Aspnetcore by default.
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: