Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
Discussion on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoTax/comments/1ga0wk5/new_tax_law_usa_forcing_fifo_for_all_transactions/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
More detailed information here: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoTax/comments/1gbvfic/revenue_procedure_202428_what_you_need_to_know/ It seems that universal application will not be usable starting in 2025... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
CC: @macanudo527 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Well, I always thought the universal method was a little forgiving, but something the US did in order to make it easier for people to file their taxes and for them to get paid. Now, they want to make it really hard for us to calculate what we owe them. This will require reworking of the transaction engine I expect. In theory, it shouldn't be that hard, just keeping track of multiple wallets, right? It'll just require a boatload of testing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I asked some questions on the Reddit thread to clarify the semantics: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoTax/comments/1gbvfic/comment/ltvfqy7/?context=3 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Closing the discussion: I opened issue #135 to track this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Check this article: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-action-cryptocurrency-investors-8183288/.
The article is not very clear, but it says that "the concept of averaging your entire digital asset portfolio (sometimes referred to as the “universal wallet approach”) has come to an end."
I'm not sure what it means with "averaging your entire digital asset portfolio", or with "universal wallet approach". I hope it doesn't mean the concept of universal application, which was discussed in great detail in #79 and that allowed us to reintroduce LIFO and HIFO in RP2.
If anybody has clarity on this, please reply here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions