You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This started as a bug reporting missing definition for the SAI on the L431, but I did some digging and it's missing/present somewhat arbitrarily across the families. It also appears that some parts have the wrong version of the SAI mapped for them, although the consequences are pretty minor, since it's only a few new registers over the versions. In particular, my reference manual for the L462 says it's the same as the STM32L43xxx/44xxx/45xxx/46xxx, which doesn't have GCR, while STM32L47xxx/STM32L48xxx/STM32L49xxx do have GCR.
I've not clicked on every part in the meta-pac, but I clicked through some of the parts listed by ST and definitely noticed missing peripherals in:
F4 (ex. F413, F423)
F7 (ex. F722, F730, but not F750)
L4 (ex. F431, but not L476)
H5
U5
I'm not sure I'd call this a high-priority fix, given the other shortcomings on using the SAI from rust (circular double-buffered DMA), but I wanted to make sure it's on the radar, even as I've just written code that does bit manipulation, rather than vendor a copy of sai_v1 in my codebase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This started as a bug reporting missing definition for the SAI on the L431, but I did some digging and it's missing/present somewhat arbitrarily across the families. It also appears that some parts have the wrong version of the SAI mapped for them, although the consequences are pretty minor, since it's only a few new registers over the versions. In particular, my reference manual for the L462 says it's the same as the STM32L43xxx/44xxx/45xxx/46xxx, which doesn't have GCR, while STM32L47xxx/STM32L48xxx/STM32L49xxx do have GCR.
I've not clicked on every part in the meta-pac, but I clicked through some of the parts listed by ST and definitely noticed missing peripherals in:
I'm not sure I'd call this a high-priority fix, given the other shortcomings on using the SAI from rust (circular double-buffered DMA), but I wanted to make sure it's on the radar, even as I've just written code that does bit manipulation, rather than vendor a copy of sai_v1 in my codebase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: