You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a newcomer, I maybe don't understand fully the ideas behind your intentions, but sometimes may have a fresh view to the scene.
I wonder why in _url_params, the key is the local variable, and the value the URL GET parameter.
As it is called "_url_param", I would expect it to be the pother way round: the keys should be the url params that are the "source" of the value, and the values of the dict should be the name of the local vars.
I always have to think outside the box when I create _url_params, they don't feel naturally.
Yes, I am aware that this would break things in the first place, but I think reactor is still in a state wher this could be easily changed without hitting 1000s of installations.... yet 😆
What do you say?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Because you pointed out this and I tried to use. I found out it was not the best solution and tried a new approach, check if you like it better: 517aece
As a newcomer, I maybe don't understand fully the ideas behind your intentions, but sometimes may have a fresh view to the scene.
I wonder why in _url_params, the key is the local variable, and the value the URL GET parameter.
As it is called "_url_param", I would expect it to be the pother way round: the keys should be the url params that are the "source" of the value, and the values of the dict should be the name of the local vars.
I always have to think outside the box when I create
_url_param
s, they don't feel naturally.Yes, I am aware that this would break things in the first place, but I think reactor is still in a state wher this could be easily changed without hitting 1000s of installations.... yet 😆
What do you say?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: