You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There were/are quite a few python recipes that became stale this week from last summer because they never received a review. Please use GitHub's sorting features to sort pull requests by their review labels and age instead of just relying on recent mentions/notifications, so that old pull requests are not ignored.
For those reviewers who may have missed the announcement when it was implemented, the review-requested/awaiting-author and language review labels are semi-automated. review-requested and language labels are automatically added to issues based on team mentions, but reviewers must manually remove the review-requested label when they are done reviewing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
General comment:
Hey @conda-forge/help-python,
There were/are quite a few python recipes that became stale this week from last summer because they never received a review. Please use GitHub's sorting features to sort pull requests by their review labels and age instead of just relying on recent mentions/notifications, so that old pull requests are not ignored.
For example: https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc+label%3Areview-requested+label%3Apython
For those reviewers who may have missed the announcement when it was implemented, the
review-requested
/awaiting-author
and language review labels are semi-automated.review-requested
and language labels are automatically added to issues based on team mentions, but reviewers must manually remove thereview-requested
label when they are done reviewing.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: