You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Let's say I have 4 tests which have tags:
Test 1 ["app1", "uat"]
Test 2 ["app1", "prod"]
Test 3 ["app2", "uat"]
Test 4 ["app2", "prod"]
At the moment, there is no way on the webapp to isolate any of these checks using tags. If I select "app1" and "uat", the filtered checks will be [Test 1, Test 2, Test 3] (OR combination)
Describe the solution you'd like
By selecting "app1" and "uat", I would like the result to be [Test 1] (AND combination)
Describe alternatives you've considered
At the moment, when sending the checks via API, we combine the tags. For example, we create the tag "app1-uat". This is not scalable but it's the only way at the moment
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
clementlize
changed the title
Checkly webapp: being able to filter checks by tags using an "AND" combination instead of a "OR"
Checkly webapp: being able to filter checks by tags using an "AND" combination instead of "OR"
May 17, 2023
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Let's say I have 4 tests which have tags:
At the moment, there is no way on the webapp to isolate any of these checks using tags. If I select "app1" and "uat", the filtered checks will be [Test 1, Test 2, Test 3] (OR combination)
Describe the solution you'd like
By selecting "app1" and "uat", I would like the result to be [Test 1] (AND combination)
Describe alternatives you've considered
At the moment, when sending the checks via API, we combine the tags. For example, we create the tag "app1-uat". This is not scalable but it's the only way at the moment
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: