-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Format for direct publication #14
Comments
Well, that sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure we need to do anything special for github.com/bitfield/shift: It looks fine! What other formatting would you suggest? |
Looks pretty good, especially in a terminal. And I must agree I was a bit unclear 🙈. Lets put the text you pasted into dillinger (online markdown editor) and it looks like this: What I was thinking was to use some more of the refinement you can use with a doc format such as markdown (not married to markdown though) to make it closer whats described for agiledox. A simple example could be to simply add each package as a sub header and perhaps some collective information as the last output in package like
That would be parsed in Dillinger like Should also note that I'm just using Dillinger to make it easy to test for anyone checking this out, but the general formatting is pretty similar across tools. |
It is possible to use |
When thinking about the use case for
gotestdox
as something that can do part of the documentation, have there been any thought about changing the output format to be something like markdown? That would enable easy publication of the results for stakeholders etc. to keep track of what a software suite supports.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: