Cannot disrupt Node: state node is nominated for a pending pod

[vb-atelio]

Description

Observed Behavior:
Karpenter refused to drain a node(instance type: m7i.12xlarge) when it's clearly underutilized(has 8 pods running) with reason: state node is nominated for a pending pod. When I run kubectl get pods --all-namespaces --field-selector=status.phase=Pending I see that there are no pending pods.

Expected Behavior:
Karpenter should be disrupting this node and draining it and scheduling these pods on another node or atleast show the correct reason on why it's not able to drain the node

Reproduction Steps (Please include YAML):
nodepool.yaml

Name:         default
Namespace:
Labels:       <none>
Annotations:  compatibility.karpenter.sh/v1beta1-nodeclass-reference: {"name":"default"}
              karpenter.sh/nodepool-hash: 12063359807553009501
              karpenter.sh/nodepool-hash-version: v3
API Version:  karpenter.sh/v1
Kind:         NodePool
Metadata:
  Creation Timestamp:  2024-10-29T06:33:00Z
  Generation:          24
  Resource Version:    47771428
  UID:                 857db43c-c406-4952-8648-d363b9079f63
Spec:
  Disruption:
    Budgets:
      Nodes:               50%
    Consolidate After:     0s
    Consolidation Policy:  WhenEmptyOrUnderutilized
  Limits:
    Count:   50
    Cpu:     4k
    Memory:  4000Gi
  Template:
    Metadata:
      Labels:
        Type:  karpenter
    Spec:
      Expire After:  720h
      Node Class Ref:
        Group:  karpenter.k8s.aws
        Kind:   EC2NodeClass
        Name:   default
      Requirements:
        Key:       karpenter.sh/capacity-type
        Operator:  In
        Values:
          on-demand
        Key:       node.kubernetes.io/instance-type
        Operator:  In
        Values:
          m7i.12xlarge

Versions:

• Chart Version: 1.0.2
• Kubernetes Version (kubectl version):1.30

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

[jigisha620]

Hi @vb-atelio,
Can you share detailed logs from when this happened? How did you determine that the node was underutilized? Did you monitor node usage during this period? If yes, can you please share it?