You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As stated in this issue, the foreign key of event_tag has been changed from ordering to primary key of event_journal for performance.
So i guess that the unique index on ordering may be somehow simplified? I scanned the source code and found that the field ordering had been used in where and order by clauses. If this unique constraint of ordering is not necessary, then can this unique index degenerate into a normal index?
Details
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS public.event_journal (
ordering BIGSERIAL,
persistence_id VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
sequence_number BIGINT NOT NULL,
deleted BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE NOT NULL,
writer VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
write_timestamp BIGINT,
adapter_manifest VARCHAR(255),
event_ser_id INTEGER NOT NULL,
event_ser_manifest VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
event_payload BYTEA NOT NULL,
meta_ser_id INTEGER,
meta_ser_manifest VARCHAR(255),
meta_payload BYTEA,
PRIMARY KEY(persistence_id, sequence_number)
);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX event_journal_ordering_idx ON public.event_journal(ordering);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS public.event_tag(
event_id BIGINT,
persistence_id VARCHAR(255),
sequence_number BIGINT,
tag VARCHAR(256),
PRIMARY KEY(persistence_id, sequence_number, tag),
CONSTRAINT fk_event_journal
FOREIGN KEY(persistence_id, sequence_number)
REFERENCES event_journal(persistence_id, sequence_number)
ON DELETE CASCADE
);
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
unique index degenerate
As stated in this issue, the foreign key of
event_tag
has been changed fromordering
to primary key ofevent_journal
for performance.So i guess that the unique index on
ordering
may be somehow simplified? I scanned the source code and found that the fieldordering
had been used inwhere
andorder by
clauses. If this unique constraint ofordering
is not necessary, then can this unique index degenerate into a normal index?Details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: