Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fable.Remoting.Falco support #312

Open
pimbrouwers opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Fable.Remoting.Falco support #312

pimbrouwers opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@pimbrouwers
Copy link

Would love to see this. Will submit a PR soon.

Opening an issue only to serve as a placeholder to avoid someone doubling this work.

@Al4ric
Copy link

Al4ric commented Sep 30, 2022

Cannot wait. Are there any problems? Is there draft somewhere? I'm curious how much work is needed.

@pimbrouwers
Copy link
Author

pimbrouwers commented Sep 30, 2022 via email

@DejanMilicic
Copy link

I am also curious about this. Seems like Falco is a very good solution for a Web API project.
However, when using it in SAFE-like setup, Fable.Remoting is used almost by default, and lack of support for it means immediate no-go for Falco.

I am sure Falco would be much more adopted if this use case was covered.

@pimbrouwers
Copy link
Author

I would love to see this as well. Admittedly I don't use this tech at all, so this is foreign territory for me. I'd be happy to code review if someone wanted to take the reigns on this.

In saying that, and Zaid correct me if I'm wrong, but there is a "standard" aspnet core implementation of this, which would be plugged into Falco very easily. Anything that aspnetcore supports, Falco does as well.

@Zaid-Ajaj
Copy link
Owner

@pimbrouwers @DejanMilicic

there is a "standard" aspnet core implementation of this

Indeed, the Fable.Remoting.AspNetCore allows you to integrate Fable.Remoting in any AspNetCore-supported framework.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants