Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evaluate coverage of GAZ with respect to other resources #32

Open
cmungall opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate coverage of GAZ with respect to other resources #32

cmungall opened this issue Jun 26, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
question questions or discussion items (comnsider splitting)

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

We are currently aligning to wikidata (#3)

It would be useful to see a complete landscape picture of what is covered and not covered in existing resources, alongside any licensing restrictions.

This can help us with prioritizing curation resources - no need to redo what is there in an existing open resources

geonames seems to be CC-BY, so would be no issue in re-using

They have a premium tier but I don't think we need it
http://www.geonames.org/products/premium-data.html

Cross-ticket on RDP: reusabledata/reusabledata#185
@cmungall cmungall added the question questions or discussion items (comnsider splitting) label Jun 26, 2019
@cmungall cmungall mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question questions or discussion items (comnsider splitting)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cmungall