There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package

[dataPulverizer]

There is probably a case for the lapack bindings to exist independently of this package

[John-Colvin]

Could be done as a dub sub-package?

[dataPulverizer]

I didn't know about sub-dub, just looked at it in the manual. You guys know more about the DUB packaging system in which I am still a novice but my thinking is that lapack can exist as a library with cblas binding as a dependency that DUB can manage.

At the moment we have scid, mir, others, cblas. It may be a good idea for packages to be fragmented to allow users to piece what they want together until things solidify a bit more.

[kyllingstad]

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the sub-package idea. Deimos is also an option.

[John-Colvin]

I agree, it should be a separate package entirely
On 16 Jun 2016 1:37 p.m., "Lars T. Kyllingstad" [email protected]
wrote:

I agree, it would probably be better if it were a separate package under
DlangScience, like the BLAS bindings. I'm not too thrilled about the
sub-package idea. Deimos https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos is
also an option.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#50 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABx9tdm4jCgE5NQIL7jIFr87GHyrkblpks5qMUN4gaJpZM4I2sdo
.